January 2010 Case Notes & Comments

“Be always at war with your vices, at peace with your neighbors and let each new year find you a better man."
~ Benjamin Franklin – 1706-1790

MONTHLY QUIZ: CONTACT SPORTS EXCEPTION: Plaintiff was employed at a hockey rink as an athletic trainer when he entered the bench area of a hockey rink where a team was “sniping” – shooting pucks at water bottles on the bench. Plaintiff was hit in the eye by a puck, and sued the team and the player in ordinary negligence. Defendants now move to dismiss based upon the contact sports exception, which provides that participants in contact sports may be held liable to a co-participants only for willful and wanton misconduct, but not for ordinary negligence. Was plaintiff a “co-participant” for purposes of the contact sports exception? You be the judge. (Answer below).

 

PATTI DEUEL JOINS LEAHY, EISENBERG & FRAENKEL, LTD: We are pleased to announce that Patti Deuel has joined Leahy, Eisenberg & Fraenkel, Ltd. as a partner. Patti specializes in insurance coverage litigation.

 

ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT: CONSUMER FRAUD CLAIMS REQUIRE ACTUAL DECEPTION: Plaintiff brought a claim under the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (Consumer Fraud Act) (815 ILCS 505/1 et seq. (West 2004)) and contended that such claims could be supported by “indirect deception” (i.e. misrepresentations and/or omissions to third parties). In reversing the denial of summary judgment, the Illinois Supreme Court held that a plaintiff cannot maintain an action under the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act when the plaintiff does not receive, directly or indirectly, communication or advertising from the defendant and demonstrate that she was actually deceived. DeBouse v. Bayer, --- N.E.2d ---, 2009 WL 4843362 (Dec. 17, 2009)

 

FOURTH DISTRICT: NOTICE PROVISION UPHELD DESPITE PLACEMENT BEFORE INSURING AGREEMENT: Defendant argued that notice provision was ambiguous because it appeared before the “Agreement” section of the policy and was not expressed in mandatory terms. The Fourth District held that neither the placement nor the wording rendered the notice provision ambiguous and specifically commented that the notice provision “was part of the contractual agreement of [the] … insurance policy.” American Standard Ins. Co. of Wisconsin v. Slifer, 2009 WL 5112329, 1 (Ill.App. 4 Dist.) (Ill.App. 4 Dist.) (Ill.App.4th Dist., 2009)

 

APPELLATE COURT CLARIFIES MULTIPLE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ISSUES: InThe Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services Ex. Rel. Elizabeth A. Black v. Bartholomew, 2009 WL 47567079, 1 (Ill.App. 4th Dist.) Fourth District held that Section 15(d) of the Income Withholding for Support Act trumps Workers Compensation Act and allows the employee’s funds to be used to pay arrearage. In Greene Welding and Hardware v. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Com’n, 2009 WL 5159751, 1 (Ill.App. 4th Dist.) the court affirmed an award of penalties and attorney fees since there was no dispute that the amputation injury arose out of and in the course of employment; and therefore, the employer is not afforded a “grace period” and payment should have been “immediate[ ] and promptly forthcoming.”

 

ANSWER TO QUIZ: No – plaintiff was not playing the game, and therefore his case survives the motion to dismiss. Weisberg v. Chicago Steel, ____Ill.App.3d____, (Second District No. 2-08-0789, December 31, 2009.)

Past Publications

2022

August 2022
July 2022
April 2022
March 2022
January 2022

2021

December 2021
October 2021
August 2021
July 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
January 2021

2020

December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
February 2020
January 2020

2019

December 2019
October 2019
September 2019
July 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019

2018

December 2018
October 2018
August 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018

2017

December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
February 2017

2016

December 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
March 2016
January 2016

2015

December 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015

2014

December 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
June 2014
April 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014

2013

December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
January 2013

2012

December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012

2011

December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011

2010

December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010

2009

December 2009